md.alam
  • Male
  • chittagong
  • Bangladesh
Share on Facebook
Share Twitter

Md.alam's Friends

  • Yuuji Nakashima
  • anton prasetyo
  • Jahan S
  • Kalyan Saha
  • ali genius
  • Airpacket

md.alam's Discussions

why 3.5GHz band is popular for wimax?
1 Reply

Would someone let me know, why 3.5GHZ band is popular for wimax? I mean, how does it provide interference free propagation of signal,better quality of service? How does this band reduce/eliminate…Continue

Started this discussion. Last reply by Rizwan Abbas Jan 18, 2011.

why 3.5ghz band is popular for wimax?

Would someone let me know, why 3.5GHZ band is popular for wimax? I mean, how does it provide interference free propagation of signal,better quality of service? How does this band reduce/eliminate…Continue

Started Jan 12, 2011

why 3.5ghz is popular for wimax?

Would someone let me know, why 3.5GHZ band is popular for wimax? I mean, how does it provide interference free propagation of signal,better quality of service? How does this band reduce/eliminate…Continue

Started Jan 12, 2011

why 3.5ghz is popular for wimax?

Would someone let me know, why 3.5GHZ band is popular for wimax? I mean, how does it provide interference free propagation of signal,better quality of service? How does this band reduce/eliminate…Continue

Started Jan 12, 2011

Gifts Received

Gift

md.alam has not received any gifts yet

Give a Gift

 

md.alam's Page

Latest Activity

md.alam posted a blog post

Eligible propagation model-which one?

Can anybody name me the propagation models for wimax which will be suitable to predict path loss at 2.5GHz and 3.5GHz? And please mention the parameters that should be taken into account while simulation.
Feb 4, 2011
md.alam left a comment for Yuuji Nakashima
"hi there! can you name me some empirical, semi-empirical, deterministic and semi-deterministic propagation models foe wimax which are valid for predicting path loss at 3.5GHZ?"
Jan 27, 2011
md.alam left a comment for Airpacket
"Sir, can you give me some names of empirical,semi-empirical, semi-deterministic,deterministic propagation models which are reliable at 3.5GHZ for the path loss prediction."
Jan 27, 2011
md.alam left a comment for Rizwan Abbas
"Sir, can you give me some names of empirical,semi-empirical, semi-deterministic,deterministic propagation models which are reliable at 3.5GHZ for the path loss prediction."
Jan 27, 2011
md.alam left a comment for Saad Ullah Soomrani
"Assamualikum. Sir, can you give me some names of empirical,semi-empirical, semi-deterministic,deterministic propagation models which are reliable at 3.5GHZ for the path loss prediction."
Jan 27, 2011
md.alam left a comment for Yahya Khaled
"Sir, can you name me some reliable empirical and semi-empirical model that can be applied at 3.5GHz to calculate propagation path loss?"
Jan 27, 2011
md.alam left a comment for Saad Ullah Soomrani
"Sir, thanks for the reply. Would you please illustrate more on 4 frequency planning and EIRP? what about interference at frequencies higher than 3.5GHZ? At which frequency do the interference begin and at which frequency do the interference…"
Jan 18, 2011
Rizwan Abbas replied to md.alam's discussion why 3.5GHz band is popular for wimax?
"Because 3.5GHz is cheaper!!!!"
Jan 18, 2011
Saad Ullah Soomrani left a comment for md.alam
"3.5GHZ band is popular for wimax because in order to avoid interference in the network and to achieve better RAN KPI values, we could move to a 4‐frequency plan from a 3‐Frequency plan. After the execution of 4‐Frequancy plan, we could be able to…"
Jan 15, 2011
chirag dhyani commented on md.alam's blog post Why 3.5GHz band is popular for wimax around the world?
"On top of it, strategically it is the band which is not used in many big/potential economies."
Jan 15, 2011
md.alam left a comment for Vasil Dimitrov
"thanks for your reply. But what about the interference mitigation at 3.5GHz? Is not it better than frequencies less than 3.5GHz? At which frequency does the interference starts and when does it starts to mitigate?"
Jan 15, 2011
md.alam left a comment for Dwain Wilkinson
"Sir,Would you let me know, why 3.5GHZ band is popular for wimax? I mean, how does it provide interference free propagation of signal,better quality of service? How does this band reduce/eliminate interference? Please explain. At which frequency do…"
Jan 13, 2011
md.alam left a comment for Shahzad Ahmed
"Sir,Would you let me know, why 3.5GHZ band is popular for wimax? I mean, how does it provide interference free propagation of signal,better quality of service? How does this band reduce/eliminate interference? Please explain. At which frequency do…"
Jan 13, 2011
md.alam left a comment for sriram k
"Sir,Would you let me know, why 3.5GHZ band is popular for wimax? I mean, how does it provide interference free propagation of signal,better quality of service? How does this band reduce/eliminate interference? Please explain. At which frequency do…"
Jan 13, 2011
md.alam left a comment for Saad Ullah Soomrani
"Sir,Would you let me know, why 3.5GHZ band is popular for wimax? I mean, how does it provide interference free propagation of signal,better quality of service? How does this band reduce/eliminate interference? Please explain. At which frequency do…"
Jan 13, 2011
md.alam left a comment for Bogere Joseph Alfred
"Sir,Would you let me know, why 3.5GHZ band is popular for wimax? I mean, how does it provide interference free propagation of signal,better quality of service? How does this band reduce/eliminate interference? Please explain. At which frequency do…"
Jan 13, 2011

Profile Information

Current Company
N/A
Industry
Other
Current Position
N/A
Country of Residence
Bangladesh
City
chittagong

Md.alam's Blog

Eligible propagation model-which one?

Can anybody name me the propagation models for wimax which will be suitable to predict path loss at 2.5GHz and 3.5GHz? And please mention the parameters that should be taken into account while simulation.

Posted on February 4, 2011 at 12:29pm — 1 Comment

Why 3.5GHz band is popular for wimax around the world?

Would someone let me know, why 3.5GHZ band is popular for wimax? I mean, how does it provide interference free propagation of signal,better quality of service? How does this band reduce/eliminate interference? Please explain. At which frequency do the interference begin and at which frequency do the interference starts to mitigate or vanish for wimax? What about the frequencies higher than 3.5GHZ regarding interference? Please reply soon. Thanks to all.

Posted on January 12, 2011 at 12:50am

Comment Wall (3 comments)

At 6:59am on January 12, 2011, Yahya Khaled said…

Well... 1st of all, the spectrum is a very scarce and expensive resource and its far more than just interference as a factor to contribute to the decision-making process when deciding what portion or what band to allocate to a specific technology.

There are all sort of economics and sometimes politics when deciding on a frequency band. I'll give you some technical overview on how to decide a suitable band, and thats my opinion and understanding off-course!!

High frequency band = major propagation losses; free space and absorption

Usually used in line-of-sight environments, microwave links is a good example. Although high frequency means multiple paths for me in a urban environments; but its not practical due to the expensive propagation losses.

Low frequency band = Big antennas, sometimes very bid antennas !!, fewer propagation losses but not practical for handheld devices, radio and analog TV are good examples.

 

Now in between these categories there are good frequencies that have reasonable propagation losses, suitable multi-path characteristics (No line of sight required), integrated antenna design and low complexity..

Now, you need to understand that spectrum managers and regulators like ITU cant just ground one band and use another one!! there is already a massive investment in previous technologies and they can just chose the best band!!! they have to compromise and find a compromise solution. Otherwise, No one would consider investment in this technology (economical). 

From this, they start looking at neighboring technologies that co-exist on the same spectrum (sometimes) or that are adjacent with potential out-of-band emissions.

 

You cant just think of interference because, in my opinion, could be managed with stringent technical specifications and proper planning.

 

At 7:06am on January 12, 2011, Yahya Khaled said…
I will have a look at the band allocation chart to identify the surrounding technologies. Probably  some satellite broadcast services in some countries, not quite sure.
At 5:15pm on January 15, 2011, Saad Ullah Soomrani said…

3.5GHZ band is popular for wimax because in order to avoid interference in the network and to achieve better RAN KPI values, we could move to a 4‐frequency plan from a 3‐Frequency plan. After the execution of 4‐Frequancy plan, we could be able to enhance our Effective Isotropic Radiated Power (EIRP) to the maximum level (384 dBm); in this way it could provide interference free propagation of signal, provide better quality of service and this band reduce/eliminate interference due this execution of 4-Frequency plan.

You need to be a member of 4G360 to add comments!

Join 4G360

 
 
 

4G360 Partner

Join 65,000 4G Insiders

Discussions

Wimax Equipment and a lot more.

Started by Alex Steffensen in 4G Equipment Apr 10.

Combining WiMAX TDD Radios

Started by JT Tiumalu in 4GTechnology - WiMAX & LTE Apr 9.

Motorola WiMAX Spares Required

Started by Hassan Atique in 4G Equipment Mar 5.

Supplier Day Event for WiMAX Operators at MWC 2 Replies

Started by Sophia Chang in 4G Applications. Last reply by yunky Feb 21.

wimax implementation. 2 Replies

Started by Ajina Khader in 4G Applications. Last reply by Kire Feb 24.

PureWave Quantum 6623 - 5 Replies

Started by RJ in 4G Equipment. Last reply by Muhammad Faisal Aziz Jan 25.

WiMAX 16d GPS sync with 16e 1 Reply

Started by Paul in 4GTechnology - WiMAX & LTE. Last reply by Deepak Gupta Jan 21.

© 2014   Created by Michael Wolleben.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service